GenAI Preparedness for Teaching and Learning at SF State

San Francisco State University has engaged the campus with GenAI programming delivered under the theme of “Sensemaking through Community.” Our bottom-up approach has been successful at creating awareness and campus discussion about GenAI while highlighting pockets of effective GenAI uses in the classroom. Led by the Center for Equity and Excellence in Teaching and Learning (CEETL) and Academic Technology (AT), a series of workshops, individual and department consultations, support materials, campus guidance & policy, and a central website were produced last year. 

 We believe that department-level engagement is key for our campus to building AI literacy and preparedness for ongoing AI discoveries. We also believe that building guidance from the ground-up through our community sense making approach can be a national model for campuses like ours, where budgets are tight and teaching loads are high.

In this study, we propose to do a needs assessment to determine levels of faculty preparedness for GenAI at SF State. Interview data from department chairs will help us build an AI readiness audit tool. One can find many such tools for the technology sector but none exist for higher education yet. This tool would then enable departments and individual faculty to pilot, assess, and identify needs for the use of GenAI tools within their courses and curriculum with a critical and responsible-use lens. The audit tool will provide the scaffolding for a canvas-based course shell, which will be used by faculty participating in teaching squares. 

Through the teaching squares, faculty will come together in groups of their choice: departmental, interdisciplinary, or area-focused (such as writing, coding or critical thinking). Teaching squares will also provide a space and structure for faculty to engage in pedagogical exercises, develop student guidance on GenAI, revise curriculum, and investigate discipline impacts and workforce preparation needs for their majors. 

Findings from this study will help us create professional development tool kits, ongoing trainings, and workshops as well as an AI-readiness methodology for faculty, departments, and academic organizational structures. It will also help build a critical mass of academic departments on our campus that can harness and benefit from GenAI applications in teaching and learning.

The Logic model provides the project plan, deliverables and short term and long-term outcomes.

grey divider 1 pixel

Team

Anoshua Chaudhuri Headshot
Anoshua Chaudhuri
Principal Investigator, Senior Director of CEETL
Andrew
Andrew Roderick
Co-Principal Investigator, AVP of Academic Technology
Dragutin Petkovic
Dragutin Petkovic
Faculty Champion, Professor of Computer Science
Ernita Joaquin
Ernita Joaquin
Faculty Champion, Professor of Public Admnistration
Jennifer Trainor Headshot
Jennifer Trainor
Faculty Champion, Professor of English
Brandon York
Brandon York
Instructional Designer, Academic Technology
Parth
Parth Desai
Graduate Research Assistant
Tannaz
Tannaz Haghi ( She/Her/Hers )
Graduate Research Assistant
grey divider 1 pixel

Goals

GENAI
grey divider 1 pixel

This study is funded by the California Education Learning Lab through an AI FAST Challenge: Funding for Accelerated Study and Transformation 

To remain at the cutting edge of teaching, learning, and workforce development in this age of GenAI, San Francisco State University, a minority-serving institution located in the heart of the AI revolution, will use this AI Fast Challenge grant to facilitate faculty development and academic department readiness, by supporting inter-faculty and inter and intra-department collaborations, leading to the discovery and development of necessary processes, policies, curriculum, pedagogical support, tools, and technical training, with a critical, equitable and ethical lens.                             

AI